Website Manager

Carolina Soccer Club

News Detail

12

Nov, 2019

CSC Philosophies Published














November 12, 2019
Concord, NC

From: Carolina Soccer Club
Contact: [email protected]

For Immediate Release:                                                             CSC Philosophies Published 
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Carolina Soccer Club is excited to announce that earlier this year Executive Director Liam Shannon was published in the July/August edition of the United Soccer Coaches "Soccer Journal".

The full transcript of the article is below. If you with to access the article on the USC website, click HERE, then click on the "July/August" edition and go to pages 66-67.




THE PLAYER QUALITIES MATRIX

The Player Qualities Matrix is a visual aid to demonstrate the complex relationships between all of the necessary attributes of a soccer player. Although the matrix is intended as a representation of all qualities, there are no doubt some missing. This is version 2.0, and it is my intention to keep updating the diagram over time to consistently improve.



UNDERSTANDING THE MATRIX

The qualities recorded are from a combination of the Ajax “TIPS” player evaluation document, and the US Soccer player development curriculum. The two sources were merged, edited, and then reproduced.

The colors of the text boxes are as follows: Green – technical skills, as defined by an individual’s direct interaction with the ball. Yellow – “soccer IQ,” or tactical understanding. Pink – physical characteristics, and Blue – psychological areas. “Shooting” is the one area where two colors are combined: a green box with yellow writing. While shooting involves direct interaction with the ball, and is therefore a technical skill, the additional stresses of shooting – excitement, worry, decision making, concentration, etc. – mean that shooting is classified as a joint technical and IQ endeavor.

It is taken for granted that attributes of the same family are, or at least likely could be, connected to one another. Therefore, to aid clarity, relationships within the same families have not been highlighted. It is also recognized that while every effort was made there are certainly some areas that should be connected that have not been. As stated; the matrix will remain a work in progress!

Finally, there are six enlarged grey / transparent qualities in the background of the diagram: Practice Mentality, Respect, Social Interaction, Mental Toughness, Sportsmanship and Coachability. I consider these areas to be unique and therefore they have been emphasized differently than everything else. My intention is not to imply a player must possess these six traits in abundance to be at all competent, but rather these qualities must all meet a minimum standard for any player of any age or any ability to be an advantage to a group or team. For example: in an ideal circumstance a player will always raise the bar in attitude and application at practice. At the very least though a player cannot be a distraction, hindrance or a negative influence at practice. In an ideal circumstance a player will be extremely respectful, well-mannered, polite, and humble. At the very least though a player cannot be disrespectful. In an ideal circumstance a player will have positive relationships with his or her coach and team mates. At the very least though a player cannot be universally despised by the whole locker room. In an ideal circumstance a player will never let his or her confidence be affected. At the very least though a player cannot consistently shut-down when faced with adversity and failures. In an ideal circumstance a player will be honorable and principled. At the very least though a player cannot be corrupt and lack all integrity. In an ideal circumstance a player will actively invite constructive feedback and use it to improve. At the very least though a player cannot be completely arrogant or shut-off to any and all suggestions or instructions.

(Article continued below.)






THE INSPIRATION


Ever since I became involved in the game professionally I have heard, and participated, in discussions regarding the most-often referred to areas of player development: technical, tactical, physical and psychological. These four areas sometimes take on different names or slightly different tones: “soccer IQ” or “Insight” (Ajax) instead of “tactical”. “Social,” “psychosocial,” or “Personality” (Ajax) instead of “psychological”. The Ajax model actually mixes some areas together: “Speed” is qualified as mental and physical speed. Despite subtleties in vernacular between Ajax, the US curriculum, and the common soccer-world, we all seem to be talking about the same things and qualifying them in similar fashions. These differences are somewhat notable, but they have never really interested me much. (Personally, I prefer “Technical,” “Soccer IQ,” “Physical,” and “Psychological”.) What has always fascinated me though, and provided me the desire to create the matrix, are the debates surrounding which of the four groups is the “most” important, and, what specific order each should be taught in. I have never heard anything remotely satisfactory, so I decided to do something practical about it.

I believe the most basic problem with the player development debate is that too many people view it as a black and white linear process instead of a holistic, cooperative organism. I have experienced this demonstrated in two ways. First, with sweeping claims such as: “You should only teach technique at the younger ages,” “Tactics should only come at U13,” “The physical stuff will sort itself out,” and “It’s all about strength and speed,” to name just a few. None of these assertions ever made any sense to me. Take them one by one: “You should only teach technique at the younger ages.” Really? (First of all, what technique? There are at least twenty different ones I can think of, but that’s a separate issue.) What about coachability and respect? Those are Psychological traits. Even at the younger ages they need to be emphasized. What about awareness of surroundings and basic decision making? Those are IQ traits. They should be encouraged at the younger ages too.

“Tactics should only come at 13.” Curiously, why such an arbitrary age? That aside; creativity, i.e. thinking for oneself to fix one’s own dilemmas; transition, i.e. applying the mental and physical effort to adapt to the most basic change in circumstance, and switching the point of attack, i.e. realizing your path is blocked and therefore choosing a different one: these are all IQ concepts. They are still valid at 12, 11, and 10. They are basic and vital thought-processes! And what about support play? At its core support play is taking action in acknowledgement and consideration of teammates. Simple respect and a desire to help are at the very least seeds that should be planted at a young age.

“The physical stuff will sort itself out.” I think we all know that you cannot make someone who is five foot ten into someone who is six foot four, or that anyone can be taught the speed – but can be taught the touch – of Usain Bolt. But to ignore speed, agility, strength and stamina with the excuse of “nature will take its course” is weak and lazy. And finally, the opposite line: “It is all about strength and speed”. While the physical aspect of soccer cannot be over looked, the actions that must be taken to gain physical superiority are Psychological traits like work ethic, practice mentality and discipline. And the situations they need to be employed in are Technical situations such as running with the ball or IQ scenarios such as mobility or group defending.

The second type of experience I have encountered with debate on the player development process is blanket dismissiveness of a more inter-connected approach, usually rationalized through over-simplification and misinterpretation. “You want to teach decision making at 7 years old? Oh, so you want to set up an 11v11 playing-from-the-back exercise then? Or a high-pressure, two-touch combination-play session?” No. That is not it. In wanting to emphasize good decision making at 7 years old, for example, a coach only needs to question, and make the player question, simple things like “Is it a better idea to dribble, shoot or pass in X situation?” And then guide the player towards an intelligent line of analysis. A coach can do this within a practice on any age-appropriate subject. “You think we should encourage a ‘winning mentality’ at 9 years old? Oh, so you think it’s o.k. then to make the same demands of 9-year-olds as you would Premier League players?” Again, no. Just make practice exercises that are competition-based in design and then put into place some light rewards and consequences based on results. It is achievable to apply such demands on players while simultaneously running a fun, efficient, developmentally-appropriate session.

The truth is a simple one, and one I think the matrix helps to visualize: everything is connected to everything. Yes; one could assert that a specific trait is more valuable than another, both within the same family and between different families. Within the Technically family, receiving on the ground is could be said as more critical than ball striking with the outside of one’s foot. (And we can therefore argue the former should be taught before the latter.) Similarly, between family’s: decision making (IQ) is arguably more essential than strength in the air (Physical).

However; wholesale assertions that prioritize an entire family over another, such as “being technical,” – whatever that means – is more important than possessing an IQ is to essentially claim that quality in control of the ball is more meaningful than having any active brain function. Or, put differently, you want a player who is a “beautiful fool”. Similarly, a sweeping claim of “Soccer IQ is more important than Physical quality” is also incorrect. It is of no use being a tactical genius if one cannot run without falling over. If simply stating “Physical is more important than Psychological,” I would contend that allowing a modern-day Hercules into one’s team, but one who is selfish, unethical and disrespectful, is not of an overall benefit. And to come full-circle: being a pure and righteous individual is not of much use if one cannot kick a ball 10 yards in a straight line, so saying “Personality is more important than Technique,” is clearly improper too.

Taking a step back and assessing the big-picture is critical. A beautiful fool is just an impractical as an uncoordinated genius, the same as an amoral pure-athlete is as inept as someone with the morality, but also the soccer ability, of Mother Theresa. More significantly we have to question whether it is responsible, or even ethical, to develop such uncompromising players, and humans, through such terribly linear thoughts and actions? I do not believe so. I believe it is a coach’s responsibility, and the coaching community’s obligation, to respect the process of development and to accept and act upon the truth that everything is connected, and a sensible, holistic approach needs to be taken to education.





Liam Shannon, May 2019

Contact Us

Carolina Soccer Club

 
   

Email Us: [email protected]
Copyright © 2020 Carolina Soccer Club  |  Privacy Statement |  Terms Of Use |  License Agreement |  Children's Privacy Policy  Login